Sight AI writes the content.
We measure whether it worked.
A content agent that researches, drafts, publishes to your CMS and pings the index — with visibility tracking attached. We do not write a word. We ask five questions twelve times each and keep every answer.
Rather see the split first? Jump to the comparison
- 3 runs per engine, per question
- Every answer readable on a link
- Free audit, no card
So who are we?
Most AI visibility tools hand you a number. A score out of a hundred, a visibility index, a line that moved last week. What almost none of them hand you is the evidence underneath it — the answers the engines actually gave, how many times they were asked, and where the questions came from in the first place.
DoableClaw is built the other way round. Five questions, asked three times on each of four engines, and every one of those sixty answers kept in full on a link you can send to anyone. The number is a claim; the answer is what makes it checkable.
What DoableClaw actually does today
It finds the questions your buyers already ask — from Reddit threads, People-Also-Ask entries, search volume, the rivals already ranking, and your own Search Console — then asks each one twelve times across Google AI Overviews, Gemini, ChatGPT and Perplexity. Sixty are tested against quality gates and five survive as your locked benchmark, so next month measures the same five rather than a freshly chosen set.
The rival names are read out of the answers rather than typed in at setup, every figure prints the number of answers behind it, and a brand named once in three runs is re-asked nine more times before that counts as anything.
The thing to be clear about on this page in particular: we do not write or publish anything. Briefs and drafts are in build and not shipped. Today you get the gap, the page or thread to work on, and the answers behind both. If what you want is articles produced, that is the other product on this page and you should buy it.
What Sight AI actually does
Sight AI is a content agent first and a visibility tracker second, and it is honest about that: it "tracks where your brand shows up… then writes and ships the content that puts you in the answers." A writing agent with eight sub-agents researches, outlines and drafts 2,500 to 4,500 word articles, publishes them straight to WordPress, Webflow, Framer, Shopify, Wix or HubSpot, then submits the URL to Google and Bing via IndexNow. Autopilot mode will do one article a day without being asked.
It lives in Slack. The agent posts a ranking drop or an opportunity into your channel with the numbers attached, you reply "approve", and it executes and reports back. Scheduled automations run keyword research, refreshes, internal linking and outreach in the background.
On measurement it tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini and Perplexity, shows Search Console alongside them in one view, and reports mentions, citations, position and sentiment with the full response viewable. Google AI Overviews is not in that tracked list. Pricing is one Pro plan at $99 a month with a 7-day trial that requires a card, and Enterprise from $2,500.
Doable Claw vs Sight AI, feature by feature
What each platform actually delivers today. No roadmap items, no asterisks.
One question to ask any tool in this market
How many times did you ask? SparkToro and Gumshoe repeated the same prompts across ChatGPT, Claude and Google AI nearly 3,000 times, and two runs of one prompt returned the same list of brands less than once in a hundred. A separate 2026 study found gaps under roughly 5–7 points were indistinguishable from measurement noise.
3 runs per engine
12 answers behind every question, 60 per reading
Runs per prompt not published
measurement and content draw on one credit pool
*Sight AI does not publish a runs-per-prompt figure, so we are not going to invent one. What their pricing page does publish is a single pool: Pro gives 5,000 AI credits a month, an article costs about 100 and a full all-platform visibility check about 31. That means writing and measuring compete for the same budget — thirty articles is 3,000 credits, leaving roughly 2,000 for checks. The month you publish hardest is the month you measure least. Their own homepage shows 51 prompts checked weekly, which on those numbers would not fit inside Pro before a single article is written. We have not tested this and claim nothing past their published arithmetic — if we have read it wrong, tell us and this page changes.
We ran it on ourselves first
A comparison page that only contains good news about the company that wrote it is worth nothing. Here is what our own tool says about this matchup, including the part that flatters them.
- Their content approach is working and ours is not. On our own five questions, across 59 answers, trysight.ai was cited as a source three times. Our domain was cited zero times. They publish and it shows up in the answers — which is the entire argument for their product, measured by ours.
- Neither of us is in the category answers. On the five AEO questions we track for this market, Sight AI was named zero times in 59 answers. So were we. Profound took 31, Semrush 29, Otterly 20 and PEEC AI 20. Both of us are outside this one.
- We rank ninety-first for our own category. "ai brand checker" brings us 94 impressions a month and we sit at position 91.4. The page exists and it is the right page — it simply has no standing yet.
- Five things they have that we do not. Writing, CMS publishing, index submission, outreach contacts and sentiment. Four of those we have no plan to build. If the job is producing content, this comparison is not close and you should buy theirs.
What each one costs
Published prices, taken from each site. Ours starts free and asks for no card.
Free audit
Freeno card required
- All four engines, three runs each — 60 answers
- Every answer readable on a link you can share
- Search Console connect: the URL behind each question
- Paid tiers are not published yet; the audit is the offer today
Pro / Enterprise
$99per month, Pro
- 5,000 AI credits a month, 1 site, 1 seat
- Article ≈100 credits · full visibility check ≈31
- Extra site $59/mo · extra seat $29/mo
- Enterprise from $2,500/mo · 7-day trial, card required
*Sight AI's figures come from their own pricing page, checked 12 September 2026. Annual billing saves 20% and grants 12× the monthly credits up front. Prices move — if this is out of date, tell us and we will fix it.
Which one fits your team
These are not really the same purchase, and for once that is the whole answer.
Common questions
The things people ask before they pick one.
Is Sight AI an alternative to DoableClaw? +
Only partly, and it is worth being straight about it. Sight AI is a content engine that also measures. We are a measurement tool that does not write. If you are choosing between them on the strength of the writing, there is no contest — they write and we do not.
Do you write the content that closes the gap? +
Not yet. Today you get the gap, the exact page or thread, and the answers behind both. Briefs and drafts are in build and not shipped, and we would rather say so here than have you discover it after signing up.
How many times does Sight AI run each prompt? +
They do not publish a figure, so we are not going to guess at one. Their homepage shows prompts checked weekly. Ask them directly — it is a fair question to put to any tool in this market, including us, and our answer is three runs per engine with a nine-run confirmation on a single hit.
What does the credit system actually mean? +
One pool powers everything on their Pro plan: 5,000 credits a month, roughly 100 for an article and 31 for a full visibility check. So content and measurement come out of the same budget, and a heavy publishing month is a light measuring month. That is not a criticism of the product, it is a planning fact worth knowing before you pick a tier.
Do you track Claude and Grok? +
No. We track Google AI Overviews, Gemini, ChatGPT and Perplexity, and we would rather ask four engines three times each than more engines once. Sight AI tracks Claude and Grok but not AI Overviews, so the coverage is a genuine trade rather than one of us being ahead.
Why does the number of runs matter? +
AI answers are non-deterministic. SparkToro and Gumshoe repeated the same prompts nearly 3,000 times and found two runs of one prompt returned the same brand list less than once in a hundred. A point built from one answer is one draw from that, which is why a chart can move without your work having moved anything.
Does publishing more actually get you into the answers? +
On our own measurement, sometimes yes. trysight.ai was cited as a source in three of the 59 answers to our own questions while our domain was cited in none. That is one run and a small sample, and we are reporting it because it happens to favour them.
Can I use both? +
That is the sensible combination if you can afford it. Sight AI to produce and publish, DoableClaw as the independent reading of whether the answers changed. A tool that writes the content and also grades the result is being asked to mark its own homework.
Sources
Figures checked on 12 September 2026. If one is out of date, tell us and we will fix the page.
See your own gaps before you pick a side
Five questions your buyers actually ask, twelve answers behind each one, and every answer readable. Free, and no card.
Other comparisons
- vs
Otterly Seven engines, tracked daily. Sentiment and crawler analytics; one answer per point. Read why is better
- vs
Profound Enterprise AEO with panel data. One run per prompt per engine per day. Read why is better
- vs
Peec AI A clean AI visibility tracker. No brief, no draft, no queue. Read why is better