Doable Claw vs Peec AI

Peec AI reads six engines. Your plan pays for three.

One of the most polished trackers in the category, with the best sentiment scoring in it. The catch is on their own pricing table: every self-serve tier includes three of the six models.

Run the free audit

Rather see the split first? Jump to the comparison

  • 3 runs per engine, per question
  • Every answer readable on a link
  • Free audit, no card

So who are we?

Most AI visibility tools hand you a number. A score out of a hundred, a visibility index, a line that moved last week. What almost none of them hand you is the evidence underneath it — the answers the engines actually gave, how many times they were asked, and where the questions came from in the first place.

DoableClaw is built the other way round. Five questions, asked three times on each of four engines, and every one of those sixty answers kept in full on a link you can send to anyone. The number is a claim; the answer is what makes it checkable.

What DoableClaw actually does today

It finds the questions your buyers already ask — from Reddit threads, People-Also-Ask entries, search volume, the rivals already ranking, and your own Search Console — then asks each one twelve times across Google AI Overviews, Gemini, ChatGPT and Perplexity. Sixty are tested against quality gates and five survive as your locked benchmark, so next month measures the same five rather than a freshly chosen set.

The rival names are read out of the answers rather than typed in at setup, every figure prints the number of answers behind it, and a brand named once in three runs is re-asked nine more times before that counts as anything.

And the edge of it, stated here rather than discovered later: briefs and drafts — handing back the page itself rather than naming it — are in build and not shipped. Today you get the gap, the page or thread, and the evidence. What goes on the page is still yours to write.

Doable Claw vs Peec AI

What Peec AI actually does

Peec AI is AI search analytics for marketing teams, built in Berlin, and it is genuinely well made — 4.9 out of 5 on G2, three thousand-plus brands and agencies, and a Series A behind it. You set up prompts, organise them with tags, add the brands you want to be measured against, and it tracks visibility, position and sentiment daily.

Sentiment is the part reviewers single out. Peec scores how your brand is talked about rather than only whether it was named, and competitors have been trying to match it. Coverage is strong too: 14-plus languages with country-level breakdowns, and any supported region at no extra prompt cost.

It also acts now, which an older version of this page failed to say. "Act on Insights" gives strategy recommendations — get a G2 profile with reviews, join the r/CRM discussions, place a story via digital PR — drawn from the sources it sees cited. On integrations it is ahead of us: CSV export, a Looker Studio connector, an API and an MCP endpoint.

Doable Claw vs Peec AI, feature by feature

What each platform actually delivers today. No roadmap items, no asterisks.

Doable Claw Peec AI
Runs behind one point 3 per engine, 12 answers Not published
How often it reads Weekly Daily
Engines included in a plan All four Three of six, chosen at onboarding
Engines available in total Four Six, plus Enterprise-only models
Sentiment scoring Not offered Best in the category
Languages and countries Market read from your clicks 14+ languages, country-level
Raw answer text, readable Every answer, on a shareable link Sources and prompts in app
Where each question came from Named per question, rejections shown You add prompts; AI suggests more
Rivals Read out of the answers Brands you add
Recommendations Ranked moves with the answer attached Strategy recommendations from cited sources
Export, Looker, API, MCP Report over API All four
Seats Not metered Unlimited users on every tier
Briefs and drafts In build, not shipped Not offered

One question to ask any tool in this market

How many times did you ask? SparkToro and Gumshoe repeated the same prompts across ChatGPT, Claude and Google AI nearly 3,000 times, and two runs of one prompt returned the same list of brands less than once in a hundred. A separate 2026 study found gaps under roughly 5–7 points were indistinguishable from measurement noise.

Doable Claw

3 runs per engine

12 answers behind every question, 60 per reading

Peec AI (all self-serve tiers)

Runs per prompt not published

tracked daily; three of six models included

*Peec does not publish how many times it asks each prompt, so we are not going to invent a number — ask them, it is a fair question to put to any tool here including us. What their own pricing table does state is the engine count: Starter, Pro and Advanced all show three included models out of the six available, and the choice is made during onboarding. So the six on the homepage is the menu, not the plan. Their prices are rendered in the browser and we could not read them off the page, so the figures below are attributed to third-party trackers rather than quoted as theirs.

We ran it on ourselves first

A comparison page that only contains good news about the company that wrote it is worth nothing.

  1. Peec is in the answers and we are not. On the five AEO questions we track for this market, across 59 answers, Peec AI was named 20 times. DoableClaw was named zero times. That is our own instrument reporting that they are in this category and we are not.
  2. An older version of this page was wrong about them. It said Peec had "no brief, no draft, no queue of pages to fix" and left it there. They ship strategy recommendations off the sources they see cited. We had not rechecked, and that is on us.
  3. We rank ninety-first for our own category. "ai brand checker" brings us 94 impressions a month and we sit at position 91.4. The page exists and it is the right page — it simply has no standing yet.
  4. Three things they have that we do not. Sentiment scoring, fourteen-plus languages with country breakdowns, and a Looker connector with an MCP endpoint. If any of those is the reason you are looking, buy theirs.

What each one costs

Ours starts free and asks for no card. Theirs we could not read directly — see the note.

Doable Claw

Free audit

Freeno card required

  • All four engines, three runs each — 60 answers
  • Every answer readable on a link you can share
  • Search Console connect: the URL behind each question
  • Paid tiers are not published yet; the audit is the offer today
Peec AI

Starter / Pro / Advanced

~$95per month, Starter

  • Three of six models included on every self-serve tier
  • Projects: 1 on Starter, 2 on Pro, 5 on Advanced
  • Countries per project: 1 on Starter, 3 above it
  • Unlimited users; Advanced around $495; Enterprise custom

*Peec's pricing page renders its figures in the browser, so we could not read them off the page. The plan structure, model counts, project and country limits above come from Peec's own pricing table; the dollar figures are what independent trackers reported in mid-2026 and are marked approximate for that reason. Checked 12 September 2026 — check their page before you decide.

Which one fits your team

There is a real case for both, and for most teams they are not the same purchase.

Pick Peec AI if Pick Doable Claw if
You want daily movement, sentiment, and country-level reporting You want to know a number is real before you believe it — twelve answers sit behind each one
You need a Looker dashboard, a CSV export or an MCP endpoint You want all four engines measured, not three chosen at onboarding
You have picked your three engines and are happy with them You want to read the answers and hand the link to somebody sceptical

Common questions

The things people ask before they pick one.

Is Peec AI worth it? +

By reputation, yes — 4.9 on G2, three thousand-plus customers, and sentiment scoring reviewers rate as best in class. The question is not whether the product is good. It is whether three of six engines and a number with no published run count is the shape of measurement you want.

Does Peec really only track three engines? +

Three included per self-serve plan, chosen during onboarding, out of six available: ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini. That is from their own pricing table. Additional models are an add-on and some, like Claude, are Enterprise-only.

How many times does Peec run each prompt? +

They do not publish a figure. Tracking is daily. Ask them — and ask us too: our answer is three runs per engine per reading, with a nine-run confirmation before a single lucky mention counts.

Do you do sentiment like Peec? +

No. You get whether you were named, where in the answer, on which engine, and the full text to read yourself. Grading a paragraph as positive or negative is a judgement we would be inventing, and it moves between runs more than the mention does. Peec does it better than anyone; if you need it, that settles it.

Can I import the prompts I already track in Peec? +

No. There is no bulk import — an earlier version of this page said there was, and it was wrong. Questions are found for you and shown with their source, and any one can be struck out, with the correction stored against your domain so it survives future runs.

Why does the number of runs matter? +

AI answers are non-deterministic. SparkToro and Gumshoe repeated the same prompts nearly 3,000 times and found two runs of one prompt returned the same brand list less than once in a hundred. A point built from one answer is one draw from that.

Can I use both? +

Sensibly, yes. Peec for daily breadth, sentiment and the reporting stack; DoableClaw as the deeper reading on the handful of questions that decide a shortlist, and the one where you can open every answer.

See your own gaps before you pick a side

Five questions your buyers actually ask, twelve answers behind each one, and every answer readable. Free, and no card.

Run the free audit See the comparison again

Other comparisons